<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>The Scientist As Historian</title>
<link>http://emeagwali.com/blogs/black-history/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2005</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:06:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Is Black History &quot;X-rated?&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As a scientist, I study black history to gain insight into the history of science. I also study black history to open my mind. Black history taught me to question what I read in American textbooks and to look beyond what is in textbooks.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, what we call black history is limited to African-American history. Black History should be broadened beyond its original “Negro History Week” to include the black Diaspora. </p>

<p>Malcolm X explained that "[t]he Black man's history -- when you refer to him as a black man you go way back, when you refer to him as a Negro, you can only go as far back as the Negro goes. If you go beyond the shores of America, you can't find a Negro."</p>

<p>Black History has been reduced to the celebration of a few marketable heroes and contemporary figures like Martin Luther King, Tiger Woods and Oprah Winfrey.</p>

<p>An immense amount of black contributions to other nations has gone unacknowledged. Black history is "X-rated" for the censorship and deletions of three black popes, great writers and mathematicians, black Australians, etc.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://emeagwali.com/blogs/black-history/archives/2004/02/is_black_histor.html</link>
<guid>http://emeagwali.com/blogs/black-history/archives/2004/02/is_black_histor.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:06:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>